How the Watergate Scandal Changed Journalism Essay

Journalism has been an demand factor in do communication and knowledge-sharing easy among stack. It has been serving the purpose of delivering facts close anything of interest to the common. It is overly the effective means used by the government in delivering essential news, policies, programs, and concerns, among primordial(a)wises to the general public.Consequently, it has bridged the gap between the government and the public. Through news media, information nigh things and events has been delivered to other people despite physical and physiological hindrances. Furthermore, it increases the awareness and versatility of the public with regard to public issues.In the aboriginal history of journalism, journalists are governed by law and are controlled by the government. Likewise, the contents of the materials are screened before it is released in the public. In addition, journalist is tasked to deliver only facts. However, finished time, the goal of the becharm of jo urnalism has dumbfound encompassing.The role of journalist in the society has also increased overtime. Remarkably, in the popularly known Watergate crap, a new theory of journalism emerged. A new responsibility has been formed by the transiency of the news reporters of the Washington Post. From merely presenting facts, a journalist has gone to the extent of delivering their own opinion on a particular issue. Above all, journalism has become a critic of public figures.In the Watergate Scandal, journalism has been the all important(predicate) means that moved the most powerful person to resign. Journalism was not merely focused on delivering news just has also pick out an investigative method of reporting. More importantly, journalism has eventually become a watchdog of any flagitiousities performed by the government officials. Hence, Watergate Scandal has remarkably become seminal in the development of journalism.History of JournalismThe emergence of journalism can be traced back in the 1st century B. C. in ancient Rome with the Acta Diurna or Daily Events (Castro, n. p.). During that time, Julius Cesar ordered the broadside of a handwritten news bulletins in the public spaces (Castro, n. p.). In the 750 A.D., mainland China initiated the dissemination of news bulletin (Castro, n. p.). Eventually, in the mid 15th century, the distribution of news and dissemination of information was made easier through the creation of movable metal type printer. Thus, it can be observed that in the early days, journalism was merely used by the government to disseminate information to the public.As part of the development in journalism, the purpose, extent, content, and forms of journalism has changed. Newsletters and books were introduced in few other parts of the world. On one hand, opinions of several writers were now incorporate in journalism. Journalism was found as possible means of influencing others by laying down opinions on particular issues in print. Pol iticians, on the other hand, discovered the enormous potential of journalism in reaching their voters and in sharing their insights and platforms. It can be observed that the development in journalism in the early days was rapid.Through the extent and influence of journalism in creating public policy and in widening public opinions, the menace was perceived. Besides, several laws possibly limiting the use of journalism keep back been enacted. cardinal of the laws is libel. This was due to the danger and injury that may be created by unaccountable use of journalism. Remarkably, in America, the producer of the first newspaper, Publick Occurrences Both Forreign and Domestick, imprisoned and the issuing was suppressed (Castro, n. p.). Several other publications were deterred from being published and many other journalist, news reporters, editors, and publishers were imprisoned. During those days, the struggle for press freedom was prevalent.The Watergate ScandalIn the early days, p oliticians are being criticized and are associated with many scandals. The electric chair, most especially, is very openly attacked by the media and the press because of the position and the public trust involved. In the American setting, the unforgettable attack by journalism on the president is the Watergate Scandal because it is the very first time in history that a president resigned from his powerful office.The Watergate issue is primarily a political scandal, which challenged the Constitution. The Watergate scandal pertains to the breaking-in of president Nixons men at the offices of the Democratic National Committee and the psychiatrist of Daniel Ellsberg (Berman 1329). The breaking-in was made in accordance with the order of President Nixon and his adjutant in order to search materials in the possession of party chairman Lawrence OBrein (Berman 1329). Unfortunately, the men making the searches were retained by the Washington Police Department (Berman 1329). The arrest of Nixons men, however, did not lead to his conviction.Further investigations led to the discovery of the illegal activities in the Oval office where President Nixon and his aides meet. The conversations were recorded. The president and his aide also tried to cover up the Watergate mess by coordinate with CIA and FBI. Further investigation showed that money laundering was involved in reinforcement the Watergate scandal. In order for these activities to remain undiscovered, the president and his aide paid the people having involvement for their silence.However, a particular unintelligible throat met with the young reporters, cork Woodward and Carl Bernstein, of Washington Post and spilled the beans somewhat the illegal activities of the President (Kobrak 71). The courageous manifestation by the young reporters about the Watergate Scandal has shocked the nation and the journalism world. The exposure also of the scandal has led to the vigilant investigation of the judicatory and t he Congress that eventually led to the resignation of the president. Meanwhile, it was called Watergate Scandal to pertain to the built in bed where the break-in was made and where everything originated.The Importance of the SourceIn journalism, the citation is an important factor in presenting credible news. Notably, journalists do not always have the necessary information on particular things, events, or people. But through sources, journalist can have unlimited access to an interesting issue, person, thing, or event, and others.In the Watergate Scandal, the young reporters, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, would have not known about the irregular activities of the Presidents men if not for the effort of a person known only as Deep Throat. Historically, the indistinguishability of Deep Throat was never revealed even after the resignation of the President Nixon. Meanwhile, in May 31, 2005, former FBI Deputy Director Mark Felt eventually came out of the open and to reveal that he was the controversial Deep Throat (Streissguth 52).In the practice of journalism, the credibility of the source should be established. It is noteworthy that the prime(a) of the reporting and the reports is the controlling aspect that invites peoples attention and the veracity of the news or information delivered. In addition, the readers look into the quality through the veracity of the facts and the truth presented.Remarkably, in the Watergate scandal, the source of Woodward and Bernstein hid his identity under an alias. notwithstanding the pressure that Woodward and Bernstein received from different sectors, they never revealed their source as a means of protecting their source. In addition, there were strong denials and threats from the administration but the public believed the news journalist rather than the president and his men.Interestingly, the anonymous identity of the source was not a factor that hindered the revelation of the truth about the burglary and wire tapping activities of the Presidents men. Instead, the information provided stirred the peoples anger against the administration that eventually led to the resignation of the President and the gyves of the Presidents men. Hence, it can be observed that the identity of the source during those times was not a serious matter and did not feign the reliability and veracity of the news.